Steve ChapmanIn defense of rattle snakesThe Chicago TribuneFebruary 21, 2016
Steve Chapman's article, in defense of rattle snakes, explains that rattle snakes are not as scary and dangerous as we have made them out to be. Chapman backs this claim up by pointing out how few people have died from an attack and when one has occurred it usually has involved alcohol. Chapman's purpose is to take the spotlight off of the campaign and cover something that is both interesting and holds prominence in society. Given the playful, "matter of fact" language and snarky comments that Chapman uses he expects his readers to get a kick out of what he is writing while also walking away with some new knowledge.
Personally, I am terrified of snakes so it was interesting to read about how they aren't really dangerous at all; although just looking at the snake above makes me quiver.
No comments:
Post a Comment